• Profile image

    I believe the plan for the next update is sometime this month, but we have no exact dates yet.

    +9 1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Don't worry, we are fully committed to making a great PC game. The only impact our goal of a mobile release has had thus far (in my opinion) is that we have a very keen eye focused on performance throughout the development processes.

    We strive for good performance wherever we can. When we implement features that can have a significant impact on performance, we try to have options to disable them or scale them back such that they can run on lesser devices. We don't hold back on really juicy effects or performance heavy features, we just try to make them optional. Try playing the game on low quality settings vs high. Its a very different experience.

    +9 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    99% of the game is done in C# since we are using Unity. I've done a tiny bit of Java for some Android specific stuff and I've done a small bit of C++ for some of our noise library stuff. I believe Andrew has used some .NET for a small utility working with screenshots on Windows. The website is all ASP.NET and Javascript I believe.
     
    That being said... On mobile, we use Unity's IL2CPP technology when building the game, which basically translates all that C# code into C++. IL2CPP is the only option for 64-bit builds on mobile, which both app stores have now made as a requirement. Unfortunately due to this, we can no longer support mods on mobile like we used to with SimplePlanes on Android.

    +6 one year ago
  • Profile image

    @SupremeDorian @Mrmaraunet I'll have to talk to Andrew, but I assume we will add a Mods button to the website when this release makes it out of beta.

    +5 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @s5ehfr9 That would be a nightmare... Asking questions is fine. We really need a better way to document these things... like a wiki or something.

    +4 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    Question for you all... what planet/moon, would you most like to see next? I know you want them all and more, but which would you place the highest priority on?
     
    A few options I was considering for the next planet/moon....
    * A Venus like planet
    * A moon (or two) for Cylero
    * A moon for Tydos

    +4 1.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Warbrine 2018.2.3 was released less than 2 months ago, so I wouldn't really consider that super out of date... We would like to move to 2018.3, but its still in beta at the moment. I suspect it will happen, probably not long after early access release, but impossible to know for certain. We will do what we can to stay current with Unity, but they have a track record for introducing breaking changes and bugs with each major release.

    +4 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @WNP78 Its something we've talked about before... It may happen some day but the simple fact is that it takes far less dev time to support XML modded features than it does to fully integrate everything into the UI. It would also increase the amount of work involved in testing everything. That being said... we literally have an 'AdvancedMode' property on the designer script that does unlock some extra options on a couple part modifiers. Not being used too much at the moment, but something we could expand upon at some point.

    +4 2.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Andrew is very busy right now.. I talked to him a couple days ago about this. I'm going to see what can be done about making the procedural rocket engine stuff easier for mods to integrate with. Its not going to happen this week though. Might take some time and some changes on our end. Probably won't make the 0.7.2 release, but maybe we can have it ready for the 0.7.3 release.

    +3 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @pedro16797 typo, thanks.

    +3 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    From the release notes a while back:

    Added a couple dev console commands to help with XML modding planets and solar systems. Use 'CloneSolarSystem id' to make a copy of the current solar system and update your game state to reference it. Use 'PlanetStudio planetName' or 'PlanetStudio planetName quality' to open a scene with the specified planet. WASD & IJKLUO move the camera (shift/control for fast/slow). Keypad +/- to adjust speed. Space to lock to the surface. SolarSystem.xml changes should automatically be recognized and cause the planet to regenerate itself. Alt-F4 to exit.

    +3 1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @pedro16797 Thanks :)

    +3 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox Hard to say what the future holds.

    +3 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    I think '.' should reference the current part. More details here:
    https://www.simplerockets.com/Releases/View/37294

    +2 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Tmax101699 @Sketchap @aydencook03 I just released 0.9.303 for Android a few minutes ago. I'm hoping the crashing issue should be fixed, but if not, it may be related to Vulkan support and I may need to roll that change back. Once you grab 0.9.303, please let me know if the crashing is still occurring.

    +2 8 months ago
  • Profile image

    It takes what it needs when it needs it

    +2 9 months ago
  • Profile image

    You guys are doing an amazing job!

    +2 one year ago
  • Profile image

    @DPSAircraftManufacturer In work

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MarioG I assume you were using XML-based parts in the subassemblies folder and dropping custom icons in the part icons folder? Yeah... i can see how I may have broken that... Its should be taking actual rendered screenshots for the icons now. I can probably add some code so that you can put an attribute on your designer part XML element so that it will skip the icon generation and use your custom icons instead. Anything else contribute to the loss of sanity?

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @WNP78 They should update, as far as I know. There are currently some limitations though... If I recall correctly, I believe they must have a command pod for the input controllers to function. Also, all the flight data stuff is only calculated for the player's craft (and based off the current command pod). Probably some other less-than-ideal situations as well.

    +2 1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Glad I could help. :-)

    +2 1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    hmmm.... I dunno if that will happen. I've made a note of it though, something to think about.

    +2 1.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    We used to bind it to the ` (Backquote) key by default. Eventually we changed it to be unbound by default to prevent this exact sort of scenario from happening. Check the controls menu ('Other Controls' section) for the Developer Console. I'd suggested removing the keybinding altogether to prevent it from popping up when you don't want it to.

    +2 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    No current plans for open source. We do plan to add official mod support in the future though. We do have some capability for that now, but it needs some work before it goes 'official'. That being said, you are welcome load up our ModTools in Unity and start poking around...
    .
    You should be able to find them here:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\SimpleRockets2\ModTools\SimpleRockets2_ModTools.unitypackage
    .
    If you are interested in making mods for SR2 and run in to any roadblocks or functionality you would like to see added to SR2 and our mod tools, please let me know! I'd love to whatever I can to help the modding community grow.

    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    I don't think SimplexFractal actually did anything before. At least it shouldn't have been returning any simplex noise. That was removed before we ever launched because of potential patent issues. We recently removed the enumerations for the Simplex noise, so that may be why you are seeing different behavior now. I'd recommend updating the celestial body and perhaps using perlin fractal instead. Sorry...

    +1 6 days ago
  • Profile image

    Doesn't work yet, sorry!

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @SpaceAeronauticsTestingAgencySATA Well I'm glad you got it working. I have no idea what is going on though. It sounds like its a bug in either Unity or your graphics drivers. I'll try to keep a look out for any possible fixes in Unity patch notes.

    If it happens again, maybe try starting the game directly from the file system rather than launching through Steam. I wonder if the Steam overlay could be interfering.

    +1 4 months ago
  • Profile image

    @SATA Have you tried running Windows update to make sure your system is up to date? Do you have any Citrix software installed?

    +1 4 months ago
  • Profile image

    @SATA It looks like your graphics drivers are out of date. I'd try updating them and giving it another shot. https://downloadcenter.intel.com/product/80939/Graphics

    +1 4 months ago
  • Profile image

    @SATA You could upload it to https://pastebin.com/ and paste the link to it here.

    +1 4 months ago
  • Profile image

    Could we get a link to your log file? Should be here: %USERPROFILE%\AppData\LocalLow\Jundroo\SimpleRockets 2\player.log

    +1 4 months ago
  • Profile image

    @SATA Its a desktop only feature for now. You can still download the custom systems that other people create though.

    +1 7 months ago
  • Profile image

    The size of the craft and terrain LOD level can have a huge impact on load times. Do you still see long load times on your desktop with a simple craft an a terrain LOD of 2 (not that I'd recommend playing that way...). Also, the very first time you launch a craft after entering the game, it will take a bit longer than the rest.

    +1 7 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Sketchap So you tried with version 0.9.303? or was it 0.9.302? Your saves were automatically updated for the 0.9.3xx release. They won't load in older versions. If you moved back to the beta, or once the final release for 0.9.3xx is out, the saves should work again.

    +1 8 months ago
  • Profile image

    @plane918273645 The stock solar system files should restore themselves if deleted. Shut down the game and restart it, they should come back

    +1 8 months ago
  • Profile image

    @aydencook03 So you can't get to the main menu at all? Have you tried restarting your phone?

    +1 8 months ago
  • Profile image

    You need to go to the controls menu and bind it to a key. Its in the 'Other' tab I believe

    +1 8 months ago
  • Profile image

    Are your graphics drivers up to date?

    +1 8 months ago
  • Profile image

    If its the part modifier script you are talking about, it will be automatically added to your part at runtime.

    +1 8 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Feluxution Are you getting any errors in the log? Did you try downloading the full project zip at the end of this post, checking whether it works, and comparing with yours to see what (if anything) is different?

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    Right-click on the game in your library and select 'Properties'. On the 'Local Files' tab, click the 'Browse Local Files' button. It should open the folder where SR2 is installed. Run SimpleRockets2.exe to launch the game without Steam.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    When not warping, regular Unity physics are used, so if you want to modify velocity, you could add force to the parts associated Rigidbody.

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Depends on where your code is running and what you need. If you are working with a PartModifierScript, there may be a few options. It is a MonoBehaviour, so you can always use OnDestroyed or OnDisabled. There is an overrideable method, OnPartDestroyed, that I believe gets called if the part is destroyed/blown-up in game, despite the game object potentially hanging around (deactivated) for a while. There is also an OnDisposed method, can't remember the exact context in which it gets called.

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Hypr Those are not magic strings, its just part of the API for the game. Stuff like altitude data can be found on the FlightData class of the player's CraftScript. For example...

    Game.Instance.FlightScene.CraftNode.CraftScript.FlightData.AltitudeAboveSeaLevel

    +1 1.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @swope All the level related interfaces and base classes should be in the ModApi I believe. I think the only change that would be needed to properly support this is a way to register the level with the game's level manager (which could easily be done now with a little bit of reflection). Its never been tested though. We had proper support for custom levels in the SimplePlanes mod tools and I don't know if anybody ever took advantage of it... If its something people would like for SR2 though, I can certainly look into proper support for it.

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MarioG I was hoping we could put something in place so that you could leverage the existing stock exhausts.

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mrmaraunet ICraftScript.FlightData has a bunch of stuff related to velocity and altitude. Game.Instance.FlightScene.CraftNode.CraftScript.FlightData I think is how you would go about accessing that stuff in a script.

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox I believe mod names need to be unique in the game. If you are updating an older mod, just overwrite the original mod file in the game's mod folder with your updated mod file.

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MarioG Burn times differ in this release from the previous release? Could you point me to an uploaded craft that is exhibiting this behavior and tell me what you are doing to see this difference? We will have to look into it. I'm not aware of any changes that should have affected burn times...

    +1 1.5 years ago