Just designed the 3m variant. Decided on Pegasus 321 as the name for the base variant. I had some extra time and kind of went crazy with multiple fairing and booster configurations.
@CommanderSword I grew tired of trying to get it on my computer so I redid it on my phone. Just uploaded the 6m, and as soon as my computers back up and running I’ll upload the 3m.
Because of the differences in module size, I decided to go with two rockets of the same family, I only have the large 6m rocket finished and I’ll work on the 3m later today. I decided to go with Pegasus 642 for the big one.
The first number stands for width, the second for 1st stage engine count and the third for 2nd stage engine count.
@CommanderSword alright, a universal rocket would only be more efficient if it can launch more than one module at a time. I’ll definitely play with it!
@Jetspeed1001 SpaceX use engines to land because parachutes are so unpredictable and would be more likely to have the booster fall into the ocean than land on the drone ship, making it impossible to reuse if it is touched by saltwater.
@AndrewGarrison I love the effects! The amount of work you have put in and the quality that is evident in everything you guys do make up for a late release.
@dootdootbananabus Really ,begging? These amazing devs are working so hard to please everyone they can, in doing so this causes them more stress than they already have, and it is simply not reasonable to ask for this. They are more likely to put a commenting restraint on your account if you keep begging than give you an apk. I do not want to give you a negative experience in this wonderful community but I do ask that you treat the devs with a little more respect and patience. Thank You.
It’s been super fun working on this with all of you! It’s amazing what we have created!
+1 5.7 years agoJust designed the 3m variant. Decided on Pegasus 321 as the name for the base variant. I had some extra time and kind of went crazy with multiple fairing and booster configurations.
+1 5.7 years agoCool, I’ll do an extended fairing config
5.7 years ago@CommanderSword No problem, if you need anything else, just tell me! I’m hoping I can get my computer back up tomorrow!
5.7 years ago@CommanderSword I grew tired of trying to get it on my computer so I redid it on my phone. Just uploaded the 6m, and as soon as my computers back up and running I’ll upload the 3m.
5.7 years ago@Nerfenthusiast @CommanderSword
5.7 years agoI apologize once again, Steam is having problems launching SR2 on my computer. I cant seem to figure out why.
@Nerfenthusiast Forgot to tag you
5.7 years agoFairing is 4 meters by 9. I’m planning on having multiple fairing confide eventually so I can work around payloads if need be.
5.7 years agoI’ll send some more specifications after I run some stress tests on the vehicles.
5.7 years agoBecause of the differences in module size, I decided to go with two rockets of the same family, I only have the large 6m rocket finished and I’ll work on the 3m later today. I decided to go with Pegasus 642 for the big one.
5.7 years agoThe first number stands for width, the second for 1st stage engine count and the third for 2nd stage engine count.
@CommanderSword Ok, I Apollo-gize for being so late.
5.7 years ago(And for that terrible pun)
@CommanderSword Cool! I’ll upload the rocket soon, won’t have my computer until Saturday but with definitely upload then!
5.7 years ago@CommanderSword I’ll certainly think about it.
+1 5.8 years agoThat sounds awesome! Thank you.
@CommanderSword
5.8 years agoWow, thanks! I was having a few problems with the rocket, I should be able to upload it by tomorrow though. Any name ideas?
Great to have you! Welcome.
5.8 years ago@CommanderSword alright, a universal rocket would only be more efficient if it can launch more than one module at a time. I’ll definitely play with it!
5.8 years ago@CommanderSword I can do that. Would you like a universal rocket or multiple?
5.8 years ago@Awsomur Oh... sorry about that, I’ve been dealing with some incompetent people today. My bad.
+1 5.8 years agoI’m with @ RenxBlake on this, totally Ariane V.
+2 5.8 years ago@Awsomur nope, it’s literally everywhere. I watched it live.
5.8 years agoAny word on the other modules?
5.8 years ago@MethaManAircraft of course! I’m only about a third done so far but I’ll for sure do it.
+2 5.9 years ago@MarioG Thanks! Career mode will be such a game-changer for programs like this!
+2 5.9 years ago@JohnnyBoythePilot that looks awesome! I love how you tied in the crafts and space center so well in one picture. Can’t wait for the post!
+1 5.9 years ago@JohnnyBoythePilot If you do, you’ll have to send me a link!
+1 5.9 years ago@JohnnyBoythePilot Thanks! I felt like doing something unique. The way I designed it I can add what mission I’m doing into the bottom space.
+1 5.9 years ago@JohnnyBoythePilot Competition is always good!
+1 5.9 years agoSorry about that @CommanderSword. Haven't been able to get to uploading it today... Here it is
5.9 years agoCool, thanks. It looks great! @nico412
+1 5.9 years agoMay I ask, what parts you used to make the cow?
5.9 years agoLooks great! The data you got on each plane is incredible and extremely detailed.
+1 5.9 years agoHere is the Propulsion Module. I have uploaded the Maximum number of crafts in 24 hours so I'll have to wait to upload the living quarters.
5.9 years agoThe Propulsion Module has also been completed. I packed a little more than 4,000 m/s of ∆v into it and it has a TWR of 7.85
5.9 years ago@CommanderSword I just finished the Crew Quarters and a service module to dock it with the hub.
5.9 years ago@CommanderSword Sounds good. And thank you! All you have to do is hit alt-j
5.9 years ago@CommanderSword Of course, any idea how much ∆v we would want?
+1 5.9 years ago@CommanderSword No problem, thanks
5.9 years ago@CommanderSword Is there a specific docking port radius and main body radius that you would like?
5.9 years agoThat sounds great! I would be more than happy to work on the living quarters.
5.9 years agoHey, I do apologize. I have not been active on the website for quite some time now and I appreciate the call back! It’s great to be here once again!
+1 5.9 years ago@Elonmuskjr it’s fixed
6.6 years ago@Elommuskjr I accidentally hid post after I finished typing the title, it’s fixed now.
6.6 years ago@Jetspeed1001 SpaceX use engines to land because parachutes are so unpredictable and would be more likely to have the booster fall into the ocean than land on the drone ship, making it impossible to reuse if it is touched by saltwater.
6.6 years ago@Jetspeed1001 you speak the truth.
6.6 years agoThe Gemini / Titan ll Rocket, I love this rocket because of the way it sort of formed a bridge to the Moon for the Apollo Missions.
6.7 years ago@CommanderSword the dot is fantastic!
6.7 years ago@AndrewGarrison I love the effects! The amount of work you have put in and the quality that is evident in everything you guys do make up for a late release.
+1 6.7 years ago@dootdootbananabus Really ,begging? These amazing devs are working so hard to please everyone they can, in doing so this causes them more stress than they already have, and it is simply not reasonable to ask for this. They are more likely to put a commenting restraint on your account if you keep begging than give you an apk. I do not want to give you a negative experience in this wonderful community but I do ask that you treat the devs with a little more respect and patience. Thank You.
+3 6.7 years agoNope!
6.7 years agoHello! I hope you enjoy the community here!
6.7 years ago