I don't really understand your question, but vizzy isn't that processor intensive. I easily ran a craft with 2000 parts with a terrain visualizer on max res.
@Mostly yeah sorry I realized that I made a retarded comment after I posted it. You are correct, but still, it's the thing about the website getting flooded. There is a difference between conventional rules (only copyright protection) and unconventional rules (copyright protection and making sure the website is still a fun place to roam)
Now, of course, you're a mod so it wouldn't be a good idea for me to convince you to change your mind about the situation and begin banning them, but It would be nice if there is some sort of limitation to those types of accounts.
But honestly I'm so confused and frustrated about the situation that thinking about stopping it doesn't fix my insomnia at all
Decent, I mean it's not gonna be a 700fps experience like on my rtx3060 but me coming from a gtx560 and an i5, I can say you're gonna have quite a performance boost
It's actually very easy. In vizzy, you have a thing called variables. It is a block with a custom name that can be assigned to anything.
How it works is that Commandchip refers to where the code is located. You can use the name of the part that has the vizzy program on it, so it is connected to a certain part's name. The inputcontroller is the location within the code if is assigned to (just use CommandChip.FlightProgram , it's much easier).
Lastly, the Rotator refers to the variable it's assigned to, and in this case, the variable is called Rotator
P.S. variable blocks are green
@plane918273645 yess, looks like things are getting better
3.7 years agonah man im not letting a friend go
3.7 years ago@Nico412 me when kraken: :o
3.7 years ago@SamTheFox still 5 vs 9 times, anyways who cares?
3.7 years ago@DrooMulticompany yeah uhm looking at your user page really supports this lmao
+1 3.7 years ago@DrooMulticompany more like bruh to you cuz none of the photos displayed for me yesterday
3.7 years ago?
3.7 years ago@JamAerospace ️🔥
3.8 years ago@SocialistRepublicKarelia I have 25 exams and 5 projects coming up in the next month, I can feel your pain
+1 3.8 years agowhy
+1 3.8 years agoJust do M/s x 3.6
it's disabled
+1 3.9 years ago@RedAndGreenAmongus how tf does your ram cost 300 bucks for 8gb??? My corsair rgb pro costs 120 bucks for 16gb
3.9 years ago@YaMomzBox420 yeah
3.9 years ago@Nytrok07 sadly not, I would've loved to help you
3.9 years ago@Matteovir yep, it is possible to automate the breaking of the wheels
3.9 years agouhm no thats how its irl, if you drive a car down a slope and release the accelerator, it will still drive on
3.9 years ago@TronicOrbital it's possible to get it twice, difference is that it might not hit you as hard
+1 3.9 years agolmao the last one
+2 3.9 years agoI don't really understand your question, but vizzy isn't that processor intensive. I easily ran a craft with 2000 parts with a terrain visualizer on max res.
4.0 years agoWhat happened?
4.0 years agoForgotten project I guess
4.0 years ago@Staticalliam7 that was either a glitch or you set the engine type to solid as well
4.0 years ago@Staticalliam7 lmao that's not how it works
4.0 years agono
4.0 years ago😯
+1 4.0 years agoWe really need this (btw awesome job!)
+1 4.0 years agoThere is a learning curve, so just maintain your motivation
+2 4.0 years ago@HorizonsTechnologies hahaha so true
4.0 years ago@SpaceCrazySR2 yep
4.0 years ago@DrooMulticompany become the next ispace
4.1 years agopog
4.1 years ago@Mostly yeah sorry I realized that I made a retarded comment after I posted it. You are correct, but still, it's the thing about the website getting flooded. There is a difference between conventional rules (only copyright protection) and unconventional rules (copyright protection and making sure the website is still a fun place to roam)
4.1 years agoNow, of course, you're a mod so it wouldn't be a good idea for me to convince you to change your mind about the situation and begin banning them, but It would be nice if there is some sort of limitation to those types of accounts.
But honestly I'm so confused and frustrated about the situation that thinking about stopping it doesn't fix my insomnia at all
@HorizonsTechnologies cry about it
4.1 years ago0
4.1 years ago@Mostly it's copying, if it was to be "fun" then I can also copy SR2, can't I?
4.1 years agoLooks good ngl
+2 4.1 years ago@EggySPACE haha np gotta give the good ones some recognition
+1 4.1 years ago@EggySPACE nope lol ur good
4.1 years ago@ColonelStriker hahaha no problem I'm glad it's finally working now
+1 4.1 years ago@Rocketron no problem bro :)
+1 4.1 years agoDecent, I mean it's not gonna be a 700fps experience like on my rtx3060 but me coming from a gtx560 and an i5, I can say you're gonna have quite a performance boost
4.1 years ago@Rocketron nope, you're good. Your videos are actually what inspired me to finally make a new rocket
+1 4.1 years ago@ColonelStriker okay I see. If you don't mind I'll take my time and see if I can fix it for you
4.1 years ago@ColonelStriker is your main command pod a command chip, space capsule or a cockpit?
4.1 years ago@Zenithspeed 😂😂😂 I fully agree
+1 4.1 years agoThanks exo
4.1 years agoIt's actually very easy. In vizzy, you have a thing called variables. It is a block with a custom name that can be assigned to anything.
+4 4.1 years agoHow it works is that
Commandchiprefers to where the code is located. You can use the name of the part that has the vizzy program on it, so it is connected to a certain part's name. Theinputcontrolleris the location within the code if is assigned to (just use CommandChip.FlightProgram , it's much easier).Lastly, the
Rotatorrefers to the variable it's assigned to, and in this case, the variable is called RotatorP.S. variable blocks are green
@HWTAerospace your stuff is actually good so j don't mind, I'm more annoyed by tertech and similar accounts
+2 4.1 years ago@HorizonsTechnologies yeah lol I actually think that at least 30% of the site's users are Indian
+1 4.1 years ago@FriendlyFin yeah I thought it was kinda weird to use the speed of light in a time formula
4.1 years ago