The delta-v of the entire craft has to take into account the weight. The engine may have a large amount of delta-v, however, the weight of the rest of the craft will lower this. This also means that the designer readout can be inaccurate, since as more fuel is used, the weight is reduced, which increases delta v of other full stages. The upper stage's delta-v will increase as the first stage's fuel is depleted. So, it is not a problem, and you should be fine.
K and also the math is pretty simple, basically it calculates how much thrust is needed to slow it down before it hits the ground. Just uses the total thrust and gravity of the planet @HorizonsTechnologies
My monumental laziness, I'll just send you this, screw actually building a new one. Universal Lander
3.6 years agoMe and @chtite451SR2 have been having this issue it happened last night at about 1AM EST
3.6 years agofunni
69 420
3.6 years agoInsight Aerospace can help
3.6 years ago@OrbitexInc I am attempting the same thing, working on handmade suborbital rockets for scientific uses
3.6 years ago@OrbitexInc nice
3.6 years ago@OrbitexInc In real life
3.6 years agoYour grammar is rough, but i will try to help.
The delta-v of the entire craft has to take into account the weight. The engine may have a large amount of delta-v, however, the weight of the rest of the craft will lower this. This also means that the designer readout can be inaccurate, since as more fuel is used, the weight is reduced, which increases delta v of other full stages. The upper stage's delta-v will increase as the first stage's fuel is depleted. So, it is not a problem, and you should be fine.
3.6 years agoirl?
3.6 years agowhat are you asking?
3.6 years agoPost here
3.6 years agoAlright I’m prepared for awfulness
3.6 years agosucks but can't really do anything about it
3.6 years agoCongrats!
3.6 years agolmao
3.6 years agoAgreed. Also, nice job on grammar, you did well. You should put this in the suggestions page
3.6 years ago@NotAGopnik fatality
3.6 years agosick
3.6 years agoalso mine is super oversimplified, I really don't feel like using the complicated maths
3.6 years agoIt also ensures that the vertical speed never reaches a positive value @HorizonsTechnologies
3.6 years agoK and also the math is pretty simple, basically it calculates how much thrust is needed to slow it down before it hits the ground. Just uses the total thrust and gravity of the planet @HorizonsTechnologies
3.6 years agoThe theories start flooding in again… I thought we ended this conversation a couple months ago lmfao
3.6 years agoJust steal my suicide burn code from beta 1
3.6 years agoWen trappist 1e
3.6 years agostill better then anything i've tried to do
3.7 years ago@GalaxticC sure
3.7 years agoAlright cool happy to help @MLGSwagPilot
3.7 years agoHave you updated your game recently? @MLGSwagPilot
3.7 years agoI mean, you can download the Stock Engine Overhaul mod.....
3.7 years agotruth
3.7 years agoSucks but it’s the law unfortunately
3.7 years agothe launch location button in the designer
3.7 years agobooo blue origin
3.7 years agoPurpl planet
3.7 years ago@t4zcomz ah shoot ok
3.7 years ago@MirazAerospace yeah it's much better now, maybe you should try it out. The controls ar much better on PC though
3.7 years ago@MirazAerospace when did you first play it? there has been tons of updates
3.7 years agoWhen will the landing leg revamp be? @AndrewGarrison
3.7 years agowhat is it
3.7 years agoWhat do i need to do to launch a large sattelitte
3.7 years ago@MirazAerospace sad tbh
3.7 years agobrrr
3.7 years agoBeta II
3.7 years agoSorry about the click baity title lmao I had nothing else
3.7 years agoyou’re good at it
3.7 years agosick
3.7 years agolmao ksp test image
3.7 years agoLol epic clickbait
3.7 years agoAccident?
3.7 years agoYep @TweedleAerospace
3.7 years ago