@GSpace True. NASA quit on reusable crafts because of the Space Shuttle. But, aren’t we all forgetting private companies like Virgin Galactic and SpaceX?
@PanzerAerospace Huh, that’s not actually a bad idea. Maybe. Would be nice to compare Nucleus to the ISV. Plus, you won’t need to refuel the ISV with Nucleus attached.
@PanzerAerospace Gah, NebulaX can’t compete with iPads… Unless I put iPad Pros on Nucleus. Hehehe. Plus, Nucleus is a lander, and never needs to be refueled.
@Arstotzka NASA is 62 years old, while Roscosmos is 29. But I do see @Tele47’s point. But I would probably ride on a Soyuz than something NASA has made, like the SLS.
@PanzerAerospace More powerful than Galaxy? Nice. Remember that you need a lander either launched in another launch and dock in orbit, or combine them both in one launch.
@PanzerAerospace Well, next year, Nucleus will be in full usage (I might’ve done too many tests), so if you still need someway to transport AstroDudes, I can give it to you.
-.-. ..- .-. ... . / -.-- --- ..- .-.-.- / .--- ..- ... - / - .-. ..- .-.. -.-- --..-- / -.-. ..- .-. ... . / -.-- --- ..- .-.-.-
4.2 years agoUmm, hasn’t this stopped a few weeks ago?
4.2 years ago@TweedleAerospace To be fair, that comment was very difficult to understand.
4.2 years agoBigger is better.
4.2 years agoyes
4.2 years agoCongrats.
4.2 years ago@TweedleAerospace Yes, it does.
4.2 years agoRocket powered by planes powered by rockets.
4.2 years ago@GSpace Same. SpaceX is amazing at Starship.
4.2 years ago@GSpace True. NASA quit on reusable crafts because of the Space Shuttle. But, aren’t we all forgetting private companies like Virgin Galactic and SpaceX?
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Dang it.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Huh, that’s not actually a bad idea. Maybe. Would be nice to compare Nucleus to the ISV. Plus, you won’t need to refuel the ISV with Nucleus attached.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Gah, NebulaX can’t compete with iPads… Unless I put iPad Pros on Nucleus. Hehehe. Plus, Nucleus is a lander, and never needs to be refueled.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Will the ISV get there? Or will Nucleus?
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Nice quote. It’s time for the next space race. NebulaX vs. PanzerX. Who can get to the Centauri system first?
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Still, it would be hard to maintain.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace It’s gonna be hard to make something to get there.
4.2 years agoHmm. Maybe.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Kay.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Saves time, though.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Not as fun as actually doing it.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace For assembly of ISV.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Cool! What launch vehicle will you be using?
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace In space?
4.2 years agoGreat teaser. Except, how does it get from Droo to space?
4.2 years ago@FalconAerospaceFAS Kay, good luck.
4.2 years ago@Arstotzka Oh. But I will still trust Roscosmos more than NASA.
4.2 years agoGodspeed. I hope your journey goes well.
4.2 years ago@Arstotzka NASA is 62 years old, while Roscosmos is 29. But I do see @Tele47’s point. But I would probably ride on a Soyuz than something NASA has made, like the SLS.
4.2 years ago@FalconAerospaceFAS Would be useful. The annual one second sale where everything is free for just one second.
4.2 years ago@ZAEI Maybe they will do an one second sale where everything is free…
4.2 years agoI filled out the form.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace I think this should work: https://www.simplerockets.com/c/6k5r9W/plan-b
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Could you post the craft to us so we can experiment with it?
4.2 years agoMaybe use a broadcast for starting the switch? Like this:
4.2 years agobroadcast cheese
switch craft to the thingy
when i receive cheese with data
do thingy
@PanzerAerospace Kay, I will build some more (doesn’t do anything…)
4.2 years agoShould I have satellite insurance? My engineers like to blow up stuff during break time… Noice forum.
4.2 years agoProbably.
4.2 years ago@TerTech That’s a lot of satellites.
4.2 years agoHmmm, I see the new fairing, nice.
4.2 years agoEveryone’s ideas are genius.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Tru. We should probably do this on some unlisted craft. I will use some old one probably.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace I honestly believe that would happen.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Got it. Btw, this forum has more than 115 comments, lol.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace More powerful than Galaxy? Nice. Remember that you need a lander either launched in another launch and dock in orbit, or combine them both in one launch.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Plus, PLS is much more detailed. Too bad money doesn’t have a purpose in SR2.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Well, next year, Nucleus will be in full usage (I might’ve done too many tests), so if you still need someway to transport AstroDudes, I can give it to you.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Got it.
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Yeah, it’s pretty big. Have you tried clipping more fuel tanks in there?
4.2 years ago@PanzerAerospace Oof. I don’t recommend using as many engines as the real thing. Try making it taller. It is 230 feet tall, after all.
4.2 years ago