The FA-31 was a naval-based fighter-bomber designed for deep strike and air superiority roles. Proposed as a cheaper option compared to its under powered predecessor, the FA-31 had an improved airframe design that kept the wingspan large for extra armament loading but light enough to bring the aircraft to high speeds very quickly. The aircraft also got rid of the tandem-seat design in favor of a single seat orientation, removing weight that would've been used for avionics and shrinking the overall size of the nose, reducing weight even more. The aircraft was in service for decades before its retirement, participating in small coalition strike missions as a bomber and quick-response strike aircraft.
GENERAL INFO
- Created On: Windows
- Game Version: 1.3.108.0
- Price: $7,727k
- Number of Parts: 527
- Dimensions: 6 m x 10 m x 17 m
PERFORMANCE
- Total Delta V: 0m/s
- Total Thrust: 121kN
- Engines: 9
- Wet Mass: 13,431kg
- Dry Mass: 10,164kg
STAGES
| Stage | Engines | Delta V | Thrust | Burn | Mass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 13,431kg |
| 2 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 13,291kg |
| 3 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 13,151kg |
| 4 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 12,974kg |
| 5 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 12,797kg |
| 6 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 12,657kg |
| 7 | 0 | 0m/s | 0N | 0s | 12,517kg |
17 Comments
- Log in to leave a comment
-
-
Mod Mostly16 days ago
@Aludra877 Should be fine. The hardest thing about receiving submissions would be the fact that it'll probably be hard to keep track of submissions. If you're expecting drawings, it's generally easier to make a forum post about it. If you're expecting (or making it a rule that) the submissions are actually in-game crafts, then a craft post would probably be better. None of it is against the site rules but it sounds more like an issue of figuring out where to host it. If you have a discord server, then honestly I'd announce it there. That's not because it's disallowed here, but because it's the easiest way to manage submissions. You're fine to make that challenge though.
-
23.2k Aludra87718 days ago
Hi @Mostly I'd like to ask the community legality of a Fanart contest which I'm thinking about hosting, yet I'd just like to ask what measures I'd have to take in order to make it community legal, or if it's community legal in the first place, since I don't want to break anymore rules or get banned, Live long and prosper
-
-
-
-
3,214 Crazyman5525882 months ago
@Mostly also why you put a strike on KashmianAerospace? He barely done anything!
-
3,214 Crazyman5525882 months ago
@Sansu it’s obviously a hybrid of a McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom and the Eurofighter EF-2000 Typhoon! 🤓
-
-
Mod Mostly+1 2 months ago
@Crazyman552588 Please do not use comments to drag out drama. It has been dealt with. More instances of engaging with altercations with other users will result in more strikes or bans. The successor/predecessor feature of the website gives automatic credit to builds and the user who made the original post earns 50% of the points accumulated by successor posts. None of what they made was stolen. Drop the situation and move on.
-
-
-
-
Mod Mostly+1 1.7 years ago
@Oprad It's based off a speculative rendition of the F-108 when rumors of its development made its rounds in 1959. This plane is based off drawings in an old french copy of an interavia magazine.
-
7,956 Oprad1.7 years ago
very interesting and awesome. i assume this is not based off of the North American proposal though.
-
402 CloakPin1.7 years ago
@NebulaSpaceAgency
I dont recommend hickeys from doo
What would the girlfriend say?
the doohickey