The Truth Behind The Conflict

I, too, wished to never do this, @PZLAgencies, but again, you left me with no choice but to tell the truth. I made this post in response to your post, mainly after you decided to involve the moderators, and of course, to shed light on my side.

To give some context, recently the user PZLAgencies has released a forum post accusing me of a lot of things, some of which include but are not limited to rage-baiting, disrespect, bullying, name-calling/insulting, harassment, humiliation, supporting users that are not him, and breaking the rules.

Apparently, the issue is that I am calling his planets unrealistic (how is this bullying?). Some planets that I have done so include his: Mansintowes (albeit this is more of a collaboration), Polmvz, Juno (PZL Edition), and Resturas.

While it may’ve seemed wrong or unnecessary, it was not bullying, rage-bait, disrespect, harassment, insulting, breaking the rules, or humiliation. Moreover, I would like to point out the time when he too did it, as shown in this comment on my planet Lestroth. Furthermore, PZLAgencies claims that I was treating him as if he was unrealistic most of the time, rage-baiting him, and publicly calling him stupid for saying, “I am not sure who you are to say--”. I said that because of the following reasons: it was my planet, and I researched and verified such. Moreover, he also talks about how he sets his surface density for his planet, which I believe meant that he was implying that I should’ve done it according to him. To learn more about it, do read the full comments. He also said that I treat all of his comments as unrealistic; however, this is the only instance that I can recollect in which I “treated his comment as unrealistic”.

In another post of mine (Nephrin), he claimed that I called him a leaf with this comment. If he actually read it, it says otherwise, and that I was comparing him to a leaf, not calling him one. However, I will admit that this was unnecessary and discourteous of me, and I should’ve simply clarified that in a normal manner.

PZLAgencies also claimed that I made fun of him and targeted him on Mrminnos’ Saharix planet, and that I apparently broke the rules there in this comment. It is evident that I was praising the author and comparing it to the other planets posted (not by the same author), which, at the time, were the in-game templates that simply had their terrain and sky color changed—nothing else. I referred to them as “boring” because I believe that such planets do not look appealing, as well as appearing to have little effort.

About the now deleted suggestion of PZLAgencies’, that is a little harder to explain (as of course he did not provide the link (because he removed the post)). However, I believe that the reason why he listed it there is that I said that it was “unnecessary”. One thing that I want to add is that I believe may have been my motive for that was when he called me “needy” on my latest suggestion here. When the user 5874 said that my suggestion was great, PZLAgencies then proceeded to downplay his comment, saying that it meant that [my suggestion] was needed/necessary. However, a quick online search of the word’s meaning proves otherwise, as it instead means begging, being in want, and/or demanding something to an excessive degree.

Another thing that needs to be covered is the incoherence of the evidence provided. With it, he claims that I was bullying (in all instances) him and being mean; however, there was only ONE instance, out of seven, that I was actually being discourteous (i.e., the leaf). Aside from that, all other evidence is either weak or does not support his points well. Moreover, he also claims that I was “being discourteous by supporting certain users”, and “filtering out the ones I do not support”, such as him. Honestly, that’s completely invalid. Somehow, I am not courteous by not supporting and following him? He also claimed that I always removed upvotes from him. This is again untrue, as there are some posts that I have left upvotes on. Moreover, he claimed that I have never said anything good about him, which again is also untrue. Some posts where I spoke well about him include: Binater and Vainia (albeit the latter seems less like a praise, it is certainly nothing mean or rude). He also claimed that I said that he called my posts bad (Number 3 from this comment), which again is false. He then goes on to say that I have always called his posts bad, and I will say it again, which is untrue, and that I can somehow be banned for all of this.

With all of this being said, I hope that both sides may be understood now, especially by the great moderators. Though I do believe that there was a peaceful way to negotiate this and resolve this, without PZLAgencies lying, accusing, exaggerating, bluffing, and victimizing himself. I have also told him that let's be civil gentlemen, find a compromise, and get over it together (taken from here).

PZLAgencies, this is for you and you only: I am sorry it had to be this way. I was wrong in a few aspects (and to some extent), and I apologize for my behavior. I will not hold a grudge against you, and I will not be conditional with you. I hope you will do the same. All I ask from you is your forgiveness for my misbehavior. That’s all.

(and of course i hope you do the same, cuz you too were a lil uh, hm, not good)