I made a reply at some point saying that Juno was probably superior to ksp2. The other day I got ksp2, and after playing it I can say with 100% certainty that it is indeed superior to Jno.
Tags
Off Topic6 Comments
- Log in to leave a comment
-
10 ElmerTheCat+1 2 months ago
@SeeyaTheFurry and @Spitty it's been very well optimized at this point. I agree that they both are good for different people though and even with optimizations it has some pretty steep requirements.
-
-
-
3,060 Isosceles51+1 2 months ago
Yeah, it is superior in a lot of ways, but there is still no planet creator, no procedural fuel tanks and engines, and most of all, it will, as @SeeyaTheFurry said, detonate (heat up/crash) your device (I'm not saying pc as current gen consoles can operate it( as in have it available)). Don't get me wrong, (even though I've never played it) I like it, but I still think that, at the moment, JNO and KSP2 are both equals, which is fine, and we all have our preferences. I hope we can all respect that.
-
No Upvotes
Log in in to upvote this post.
Despite the similarities, they are games for different audiences. At the moment, I prefer Juno, as KSP2 currently lacks the features I bought it for (colonies, multiplayer). Juno is targeted more towards engineering, realism, and fine-tuning the design of your rockets, while KSP2 is targeted more as an exploration game. Add in performance, I prefer Juno overall currently.