Right now we have Kerosene, Monopropellant, and Xenon. All of those are actually monopropellants in this context!

Let's embrace authenticity and go for a few different fuel types. The engines can be configured to run off of either.

  • Kerosene and Liquid Oxygen: Roughly the same performance we have in the engines and fuel tanks now. Throttle response is slightly slow, as you need to get the turbopumps spun up.
  • Liquid Hydrogen and Liquid Oxygen: Much less dense fuel compared to Kerosene, but far higher specific impulse--390s to 430s or so. Throttle response is slightly slow, as well. Low-density hydrogen behaves so different from higher density kerosene that it really does make sense to have separate fuels. Hydrogen will boil off over time.
  • Monopropellant: Low TWR, low efficiency, reasonably dense fuel. Immediate throttle response.
  • Liquid Hydrogen: Not burnable alone in chemical engines, but it can be used as a high Isp, low thrust propellant for Nuclear Thermal Rockets, which I will describe in another post.
  • Kerosene: Not burnable alone in chemical engines, but it can be used as a mediocre Isp, high thrust propellant for NTRs.
  • Liquid Oxygen: Not burnable alone in chemical engines, but it can be used as a mid-Isp, mid-thrust propellant for NTRs.
  • Solid Rocket Fuel: Used for Solid Rocket Boosters, which I will describe in another post.
Suggestion Done Fixed in 0.7.0.5

9 Comments

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    In development!

    5.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    In development!

    +2 5.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnotherFireFox That would be an interesting feature to have.

    But this is Simple Rockets, there's only so much complexity you can get.

    +2 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Monopropellant? No! We need more variation, including gaseous hydrogen boiled off from LH!

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    This post has been merged with this post.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    UPDATE

    Methane and Methane/Oxygen is also a very good propellant.

    It combines high Isp and moderate density. And it's particularly good in NTRs, as outlined in my other post.

    +4 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @mjdfx150529 Yes, but this is Simple Rockets after all.

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AndrewGarrison this suggestion will work extremely well with my Advanced Customizable Engines!

    +2 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Won’t kerosene deposit soot all over the engine if you try to use it in an NTR?

    5.5 years ago

14 Upvotes

Log in in to upvote this post.