Scientists originally thought this was just another venusian or sub-neptune planet due to its thick atmosphere, but it turns out to be the complete opposite: a habitable world, but covered in a thick layer of blue fog on the upper atmosphere.
Naibol is also the new homeworld for the Masakians, as its atmosphere is similar enough to the 85-15 nitrogen-oxygen mixture that they require. Its surface is mostly made up of islands, most of which have a dry, desert interior but with grasslands near the shores. These islands are also home to various mountains that are far taller than most terrain on Naibol.
Original idea by me for Ylias (now Seeya), but due to issues on his end at the time, i made it myself instead, and now it's added to ZG2
GENERAL INFO
- Created On: iOS
- Game Version: 1.3.114.0
CHARACTERISTICS
- Radius: 1,453 km
- Sea Level: 0 m
- Surface Gravity: 10.2 m/s
- Rotational Period: 14h
- Escape Velocity: 5.46 km/s
- Mass: 3.24E+23kg
Atmosphere
- Height: 122 km
- Scale Height: 8,208 m
- Surface Air Density: 2.810 kg/m3
- Surface Temperature: 303 K
EQUIRECTANGULAR MAP
11 Comments
- Log in to leave a comment
-
8,713 PZLAgenciesone month ago
@Zenithspeed i was talking about atmosphere density, for me i usually go in between 0.75 and 1.5 kg/m3 for habitable worlds
-
28.0k Zenithspeed+1 one month ago
@PZLAgencies in the game's 1/5th stock scale it is actually quite similar to Earth (which is denser than the average planet, to be fair) seeing as Droo has 1274km radius and 9.8 m/s^2 gravity, whereas Naibol has 1453km radius and 10.2 m/s^2 gravity
and if you mean atmospheric density, yeah i went a little bit more dense this time, usually i go for values between 0.5 and 1.8 kg/m^3 for habitable worlds and similar stuff
-
-
-
-
8,713 PZLAgencies1.4 years ago
@Zenithspeed ok. make sure to add a launch location to maximize travel throughout the galaxy
-
-
8,713 PZLAgencies1.4 years ago
wheres the base otherwise looks very nice! ZG2 just has the best bodies ive ever seen.
-
-
28.0k Zenithspeed+1 1.5 years ago
@Seeya here you go, i guess... though what i said was a long time ago so you probably won't remember it (and since that was on your old account you won't be able to find it anyways)
@PZLAgencies those are also very good values for atmosphere density, as you may know i like to go a bit outlandish with planet parameters sometimes