Helleska

@Tallisar I stand corrected. Not even going to try to argue because I have no valid point. I actually appreciate that you took your time to look into this, it is interesting to see what the circumstances would have to be for a world like this to develop.

@Tallisar alright then

1) It depends on what or how “Venusian” is defined. Given how Venusian planets are like Venus, then I at least expect for the climatological parameters to have some sort of similarity. The planet’s atmosphere is not as dense, nor is the planet as hot. Therefore, I deem this planet to not be Venusian, but simply a planet with a thick atmosphere. Otherwise, every planet that has a surface pressure and/or surface density greater than that of Earth should be considered Venusian.
………………..
2) I have my reasons as to why I disagree with you. Most times, I find you to be incorrect or wrong (with there being a chance that you actually are—and of course, a chance that I am wrong). If you find me to be irritating and “making you crash out”, feel free to ignore me. Also, I only speak. I am not doing anything that is drastically affecting you, let alone insulting. If being told “no” many times angers you, perhaps you should try introspecting.

@PZLAgencies

For the proximity of the star, the moon would be more than two and a half times hotter than it is reported--and that is not in real scale for both the star and distance. If the size of the star were to be kept the same, but the distance multiplied by a factor of 5, then the temperature (err.. equilibrium) will be a lot lower, roughly about 387 degrees kelvin, which is considerably closer to the reported temperature than 865 degrees kelvin with the current orbital data. Now, I should mention that I assumed the planet's albedo bond to be 0.75, which is analogous to that of Venus. Putting everything in real scale makes the temperature just the same as it is with the current scale. I do know this is unnecessary, and it may seem brunt, however, I just simply like to fully explore worlds that are of my interest, @ToadAeronautics (this essentially means that I am interested in this world). For the moon to be near the reported temperature, I suggest an orbital distance from Fulcrum B of about 10-7.5 gigameters, or 0.0668-0.0501 astronomical units. Though that may be too much, given how small the system is.

@Tallisar it is venusian. now pls stop making me crash out in my mind by saying no to everything i say. it is irritating. if its incorrect, just dont reply. btw im not mad at you, just saying

@ToadAeronautics yea ik, but is it meant to be a venusian planet?

@PZLAgencies It is.

@Tallisar it looks like a venusian template

@Tallisar I meant for its proximity to the star.

This planet is in fact, not venusian, @PZLAgencies.

@Tallisar for a venusian planet, it is

I don't think 357 degrees Kelvin is "peculiarly cold".