@SupremeDorian maybe, but I just thought it was funny that the day after Pedro told someone to make a suggestion, he gets rid of our ability to make suggestions.
Yes we do understand the reason behind this decision. you think that with no button for suggestions, you don't have to do anything the community asks you do.
IMO, sr2 is all you need because it's easier to build and has a much bigger area to explore. However, I would still buy sp because the sp website has pretty much any plane you could ever ask for, and there's combat.
Airplane has a PID for roll, and is oriented horizontally. Rocket does not have a PID for roll, and is oriented vertically. The PIDs are also set to different values that work better depending on what you're going for. You can have an "airplane" go into space
@Hannah1212 a bit of math lol. Understatement of the year. I'm trying to teach myself orbital mechanics so that I can figure out when to deorbit one of my own craft, except I also need to account for lift because space plane.
The lower the orbit you descend from, the lower the speed in which you enter the atmosphere. When you travel through the atmosphere at lower speeds, re-entry is less intense.
In a space plane, you want a center of thrust that aligns well with your center of mass. If you're going for a vanilla approach, the placement of fuel is also very important, as when you run out of fuel, your craft weighs less, and the center of mass will change if not placed carefully.
😢
6 months agoThe Saturn v preset doesn't affect how many boosters you have
6 months agoI only want one thing from this game (and it isn't career mode).
+1 6 months ago@FelixFan1 @12ocketguy It's very important who wins this argument. The fate of the of SR2 depends on it!
+7 8 months ago@Hermes01000100 in career mode
8 months agoNot with the current name suggestions. We should wait until we know what the goal of the game is going to be before changing the name.
+3 8 months agoYou can make pistons and rotators stronger
+1 9 months ago@SupremeDorian maybe, but I just thought it was funny that the day after Pedro told someone to make a suggestion, he gets rid of our ability to make suggestions.
+1 11 months agoYou could just make it so that if the title includes a certain key word, the poster has to look at other suggestions that contain the key word.
11 months agoYes we do understand the reason behind this decision. you think that with no button for suggestions, you don't have to do anything the community asks you do.
11 months agoWhat would this project be??
one year agoNot bad
+1 one year agoRIP 5th gen fighter
one year ago- Mobile players outnumber PC players, PC players just generally make better, more detailed crafts than do mobile players.
- If you think there is a lack of aesthetically pleasing crafts that have low part counts on this website, make your own and publish them.
+5 one year agoMake a really big engine and scale plume size down to .01 and turn off collisions.
1.1 years agoSet roll to + or - until bank angle = x degrees then set roll to 0.
Basic concept. You'd need to make a basic PID to make it actually work.
+1 1.1 years agoThe sexiest car ever made finally comes to sr2.
+2 1.1 years agoHorses in the background
1.7 years agoThis isn't really something you need to post a forum about.
+1 1.7 years ago@JastroOne1 also, gratz on getting silver
+1 1.7 years agoVolume 2 would be awesome
+1 1.7 years agoIt's most likely because the center of mass is moving when you use fuel
+2 1.7 years agoNP. Real life always comes first
+3 1.7 years agoNo need
1.7 years agoI'm excited for it to come out
1.7 years agoNTR concept crafts look really cool but aren't very practical.
1.7 years agoIMO, sr2 is all you need because it's easier to build and has a much bigger area to explore. However, I would still buy sp because the sp website has pretty much any plane you could ever ask for, and there's combat.
+1 1.7 years agoKeep it up!
+1 1.8 years ago@TweedleAerospace thanks
1.8 years agoWithout increasing fuel consumption, not thrust
1.8 years ago@TweedleAerospace is there a way to increase efficiency without increasing thrust on the newer engines?
1.8 years agoStarted doing something like this in January
1.8 years agoI'll look out for it
1.9 years agoThis forum post has a bunch of cool tips for post formatting, including posting links and images.
+1 1.9 years agoNice
+1 1.9 years agoJet engines don't work under water, in my experience
+1 1.9 years agoTime to build a sub
1.9 years ago@JastroOne1 do you want there to be an airlock on the shuttle?
1.9 years agoAirplane has a PID for roll, and is oriented horizontally. Rocket does not have a PID for roll, and is oriented vertically. The PIDs are also set to different values that work better depending on what you're going for. You can have an "airplane" go into space
+1 1.9 years agoOccupy mars
1.9 years agoWell written
+1 1.9 years agoYo, I've got an Ender 3 Pro
1.9 years agoWhat 3d printer do you have?
1.9 years agoThe SLS is stupid expensive
1.9 years agoWelcome
+1 1.9 years ago@Hannah1212 a bit of math lol. Understatement of the year. I'm trying to teach myself orbital mechanics so that I can figure out when to deorbit one of my own craft, except I also need to account for lift because space plane.
1.9 years agoThe lower the orbit you descend from, the lower the speed in which you enter the atmosphere. When you travel through the atmosphere at lower speeds, re-entry is less intense.
1.9 years agoIn a space plane, you want a center of thrust that aligns well with your center of mass. If you're going for a vanilla approach, the placement of fuel is also very important, as when you run out of fuel, your craft weighs less, and the center of mass will change if not placed carefully.
1.9 years ago@iAEROSPACE ok I'll look out for the next one then
1.9 years agoLooks alright but.... There are too many starships on this website.
1.9 years ago