I don’t think the name fits because you can play in other star systems that aren’t Juno. If Juno was the only system you could play in, my opinion would be different.
@BM94 Alright, I’ll start with this and then come back if I need more advice. So what you’re saying is take the A-10 warthog approach, which is when they had a gun and they just built a plane around it, I think.
@MirazAerospace That’s not what I meant but that’s a good suggestion too. I meant that as the radius of the tank increases the amount of sides it has does too to preserve the perceived level of detail.
@MirazAerospace I know but it’s just too low poly. I feel like there should be a mechanic where fuel tanks add more sides the larger they get to preserve detail.
@BeastHunter I meant to say SABER btw, same thing. Basically they are jet engines that can switch to running on liquid oxidizer once they get too high up in the atmosphere for jet engines to work.
This should be the Tydos loading screen. Hands-down.
+8 2.1 years agoI don’t think the name fits because you can play in other star systems that aren’t Juno. If Juno was the only system you could play in, my opinion would be different.
+5 1.3 years agoLet it be.
+3 1.2 years agoAh yes, another useless iSpace account.
+3 2.1 years agoI have no idea why you posted this but I’m glad you did.
+2 one year ago@BM94 Alright, I’ll start with this and then come back if I need more advice. So what you’re saying is take the A-10 warthog approach, which is when they had a gun and they just built a plane around it, I think.
+2 1.1 years agoNice! I think this mod definitely falls into the category of: "How is this not in the base game already?"
+2 1.2 years agoYeah this would especially be good for grouping career crafts away from other stuff.
+1 2 months ago@Zenithspeed so they’re going the SFS route and locking all the actually good qualities about the game behind a paywall. That sucks.
+1 2 months ago@Zenithspeed transmissions too!
+1 5 months agoI think better detailed fuel tanks/ higher poly counts would be nice.
+1 9 months ago@Zenithspeed Oh I don't want the planets I was just wondering.
+1 10 months ago@TheSecondStupid Makes sense.
+1 10 months agoWait what about the Zenithspeed archive? Does he have all of your planets or are they just gone now?
+1 10 months ago@MirazAerospace That’s not what I meant but that’s a good suggestion too. I meant that as the radius of the tank increases the amount of sides it has does too to preserve the perceived level of detail.
+1 10 months ago@MirazAerospace I know but it’s just too low poly. I feel like there should be a mechanic where fuel tanks add more sides the larger they get to preserve detail.
+1 10 months agoYeah ChaoticGraviton is right. Pics or it didn’t happen. Nice job tho if this is legit.
+1 one year ago@wzr1 I have played it and honestly I don't like it.
+1 one year ago@Ylias lol nice
+1 one year agoNice!! Quick question: are you going to revamp the other launch sites eventually or just the KSC?
+1 1.1 years ago@SamTheFox I meant, can’t blame him. This game does get repetitive after a while. Even career mode is boring.
+1 1.2 years ago@Pedro1745 No the account on the website
+1 1.2 years agoSounds good! How would you organize the forums?
+1 1.4 years ago@TronicOrbital Haha ig. Doesn’t answer the question but I get your point
+1 1.4 years ago@BeastHunter I meant to say SABER btw, same thing. Basically they are jet engines that can switch to running on liquid oxidizer once they get too high up in the atmosphere for jet engines to work.
+1 1.4 years ago@BeastHunter RAPIERs?
+1 1.4 years ago@BeastHunter You can, it’s just difficult since RAPIER parts don’t really exist well.
+1 1.4 years agoMake that hole mod stock
+1 1.6 years ago@TronicOrbital Thanks. An updated Auto-Abort is definitely in the works.
+1 1.8 years ago@TronicOrbital Thanks
+1 2.0 years ago@IceCraftGaming It was a bonus for joining the website in the early days, so I just think that it's now a permanent thing.
+1 2.0 years agoIsn't there a simpler verison of the image url? It doesn't seem to be working for me.
+1 2.1 years agoIsn’t this widely known or am I just stupid?
25 days ago@Spitty It’s literally Eclipse.
one month ago@CloakPin I already own full access, and have for 5 years.
2 months ago@Toinkove Usually devs put less in the free version than the paid version, and usually the amount of stuff in the free version is very, very limited.
2 months agoYeah someone is, though the developer (Insanity) just recently put it on hold.
2 months ago@HorizonsTechnologies They all do.
3 months ago@PZLAgencies Then why comment?
3 months ago@AlphaAreospace Ah yes, the ultimate roadblock
5 months agoWhy would you bring the FAA into your fictional company lol
5 months ago@StingerTheRaven I just copied the types from google lol so I actually didn’t know that. Thanks for teaching me something new!
5 months ago@AlphaAreospace No.
6 months agoWhy would you want to go back to 1.1 plumes?
6 months ago@LeMagicBaguette Good Idea.
9 months ago@NuclearSaltWaterRocket Wait did you create an account just to comment this?
Good point tho
11 months agoThis is so cute! Nice work!
one year agoYou still can’t select ascending or descending nodes as of now I think. Sorry! Also I was reading this entire exchange and I have some answers: